Dominant jerks: People infer dominance from the utterance of challenging and offensive statements
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 16 (4), 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.6999
Abstract
Could there be upsides to rudely challenging people’s positions? If no one calls out the speaker of a challenging or offensive statement, it might be because the audience is afraid to challenge the speaker, thereby suggesting the speaker holds a dominant position. In two experiments (N = 635), participants read vignettes in which a speaker uttered a statement that was challenging (it directly clashed with the audience’s prior views) or unchallenging (it agreed with the audience’s prior views). We also manipulated whether the audience accepted or rejected the statement after it was uttered. In Experiment 1 the statements were about mundane topics, while in Experiment 2 the statements were offensive. In both experiments, speakers uttering challenging statements that the audience nonetheless accepted were deemed more dominant and more likely to be the boss of the audience members. This shows that people use audience reactions to challenging statements to infer dominance, and suggests that people might use the utterance of challenging statements to demonstrate their dominance.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reactions to prejudicial statements: The influence of statement content and characteristics of the commenter.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2009
- Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrenceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- The role of valence in the perception of agency and communionEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- An interactionist perspective on dominance‐submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skillCommunication Monographs, 2000
- Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An "experimental ethnography."Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- Detecting and Labeling Prejudice: Do Female Perpetrators Go Undetected?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991
- Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task GroupsAmerican Sociological Review, 1987
- Dominance: The baby and the bathwaterBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1981