Second-trimester abortion: women often lack the choice they should be offered
Open Access
- 10 October 2017
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
- Vol. 43 (4), 249-251
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101907
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Second-trimester abortion: women often lack the choice they should be offeredBMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2017
- Comparing two regimens of intravaginal misoprostol with intravaginal gemeprost for second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomised controlled trialBMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2017
- Termination for fetal anomaly: Are women in England given a choice of method?Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014
- Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13-20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2011
- Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancyEmergencias, 2011
- Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortionEmergencias, 2008
- Reasons for Second Trimester Abortions in England and WalesReproductive Health Matters, 2008
- Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion: a pilot randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Infection in the prediction and antibiotics in the prevention of spontaneous preterm labour and preterm birthBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003