Losing my loss aversion: The effects of current and past environment on the relative sensitivity to losses and gains
Open Access
- 27 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 27 (6), 1333-1340
- https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01775-y
Abstract
It is often assumed that most people are loss averse, placing more weight on losses than commensurate gains; however, some research identifies variability in loss sensitivity that reflects features of the environment. We examined this plasticity in loss sensitivity by manipulating the size and distribution of possible outcomes in a set of mixed gambles, and assessing individual stability in loss sensitivity. In each of two sessions, participants made accept-reject decisions for 64 mixed-outcome gambles. Participants were randomly assigned to conditions defined by the relative range of losses and gains (wider range of losses vs. wider range of gains), and the currency-units at stake (‘pennies’ vs. ‘pounds’). Participants showed modest but non-trivial consistency in their sensitivity to losses; though loss sensitivity also varied substantially with our manipulations. When possible gains had greater range than possible losses, most participants were loss averse; however, when possible losses had the greater range, reverse loss aversion was the norm (i.e., more weight on gains than losses). This is consistent with decision-by-sampling theory, whereby an outcome’s rank within a consideration-set determines its value, but can also be explained by the gamble’s expected-value rank within the decision-set, or by adapting aspirations to the decision-environment. Loss aversion was also reduced in the second session of decisions when the stakes had been higher in the previous session. This illustrates the influence of prior context on current sensitivity to losses, and suggests a role for idiosyncratic experiences in the development of individual differences in loss sensitivity.Keywords
Funding Information
- King's College London
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Losses as modulators of attention: Review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.Psychological Bulletin, 2013
- The Effect of Foregone Outcomes on Choices From ExperienceExperimental Psychology, 2012
- Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theoryCognition, 2012
- Distributions of observed death tolls govern sensitivity to human fatalitiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under RiskScience, 2007
- Decision by samplingCognitive Psychology, 2006
- Bad is Stronger than GoodReview of General Psychology, 2001
- Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium PuzzleThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995
- Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo BiasJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979