Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study
Open Access
- 8 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 11 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84996-y
Abstract
Marital status proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with breast cancer. We therefore strove to explore the impact of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We selected patients meeting the eligibility criteria from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer database. We then used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model to analyze the effect of dynamic changes in marital status on the prognosis of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific special survival (BCSS). Compared with the patients in the Single–Single group and the divorced/separated/widowed–divorced/separated/widowed (DSW–DSW) group, patients in the Married–Married group were significantly associated with better BCSS (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14–1.25, P < 0.001, respectively) and OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20–1.30, P < 0.001; HR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45–1.54, P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast to the DSW–DSW group, the Single–Single group and the DSW–Married group showed similar BCSS (HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92–1.05, P = 0.660; HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97–1.15, P = 0.193, respectively) but better OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09–1.19, P < 0.001; HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.25–1.40, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the Single–Single group, the Single–Married group showed significantly better BCSS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.36, P = 0.003) but no difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.98–1.18, P = 0.102); In contrast to the Married–DSW group, the Married–Married group exhibited better BCSS (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05–1.18, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22–1.32, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated that, regardless of their previous marital status, married patients had a better prognosis than unmarried patients. Moreover, single patients obtained better survival outcomes than DSW patients. Therefore, it is necessary to proactively provide single and DSW individuals with appropriate social and psychological support that would benefit them.Keywords
Funding Information
- Keqiao District Science and Technology Project
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpersonal influences and attitudes about adjuvant therapy treatment decisions among non-metastatic breast cancer patients: an examination of differences by age and race/ethnicity in the BQUAL studyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012
- The effect of marital status on stage and survival of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a population-based studyCancer Causes & Control, 2011
- Breast cancer in young womenBreast Cancer Research, 2010
- Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: A meta-analysisCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2010
- Treatment Effects in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding: Dealing With Observations in the Tails of the Propensity Score Distribution--A Simulation StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Decision Involvement and Receipt of Mastectomy Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Breast Cancer PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Delay of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation following breast cancer surgery among elderly womenBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- The Influence of Marital Status on the Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival of Older Women with Breast CancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005
- Marital status, treatment, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiformeCancer, 2005
- A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing RiskJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999