Job Requirements, Resources and Proactive Behavior at Work: The Role of Work Engagement and Stress
Open Access
- 17 July 2019
- journal article
- Published by Vilnius University Press in Psichologija
- Vol. 59, 8-22
- https://doi.org/10.15388/psichol.2019.1
Abstract
Proactive employees are an important part of social capital in modern organizations that operate in a competitive and ever-changing business environment. Proactive behavior (PB) is defined as self-directed and future-oriented actions that are aimed to change the situation, work environment, or oneself (Bindl & Parker, 2010). Proactive workers initiate individual and organizational changes, and they not only respond to work requirements or adapt to environmental conditions (Fritz & Sonnentag, 2009). Therefore, it is important to analyze the work and personal characteristics that may be significant in order to enhance the employees’ PB. The paper presents an empirical study that integrates the theoretical approaches of Proactive Behavior (Parker & Collins, 2010) and Job Demands – Resources (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). It is aimed, first, to examine the links between job demands (pace and amount of work, emotional and mental workload), resources (autonomy and feedback), and work engagement and stress with employee strategic proactive behaviors as well as work and person-environment fit proactive behaviors. Second, to determine the role that work engagement and stress have in the relationships between job characteristics and PB types. A total of 386 employees from various Lithuanian organizations were surveyed online. Sixty one percent of the respondents were female; the average age of the respondents was 34.8 (SD = 11.32) years, with an average of 7.3 (SD = 8.22) years of working experience in their organizations. Twenty one percent of the respondents were first-level managers. Most of the respondents (93.6%) had acquired higher education. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that strategic PB, through engagement as a mediator, was predicted by autonomy, mental workload, and feedback; proactive work behavior was predicted by emotional workload, while mental workload, autonomy, and feedback were related to proactive work behavior through work engagement as a mediator; proactive person-environment fit behavior was predicted only by feedback via work engagement as a mediator. The study has shown that employee PB can be reinforced not only with job resources (autonomy and feedback) but job demands as well (the mental and emotional workload) via the mediative effect of work engagement. Work stress was not related with PB. The practical applications of research findings are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- How a Learning-Oriented Organizational Climate is Linked to Different Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Employee ResilienceSocial Indicators Research, 2018
- Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2017
- High-Performance Work Systems and Proactive Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological EmpowermentInternational Journal of Business and Management, 2015
- Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2011
- Towards a model of work engagementCareer Development International, 2008
- Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performanceHuman Resource Management, 2004
- Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in OrganizationsJournal of Management, 2003
- Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring InstrumentInternational Journal of Testing, 2001
- Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource PerspectiveThe Academy of Management Journal, 1986
- The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986