Start-Up Teams: A Multidimensional Conceptualization, Integrative Review of Past Research, and Future Research Agenda
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Annals
- Vol. 14 (1), 231-266
- https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0061
Abstract
Academic interest in start-up teams has grown dramatically over the past 40 years, with researchers from a wide variety of disciplines actively studying the topic. Although this widespread interest is encouraging, a review of the literature reveals a lack of consensus in how researchers conceptualize and operationally define start-up teams. A lack of consensus on the core phenomenon—a foundational part of a strong paradigm—has stifled the systematic advancement of knowledge about start-up teams, which has downstream implications for the viability of this field of research. To advance the development of a stronger paradigm, we present a multidimensional conceptualization of start-up teams that is derived from points of consensus in existing definitions. Our multidimensional conceptualization accounts for the fact that, although all are under the umbrella of the concept of “start-up team,” start-up teams vary in a set of key ingredients—ownership of equity, autonomy of strategic decision-making, and entitativity. This conceptualization serves as a framework for reviewing and beginning to integrate past research on start-up teams. It also serves as a framework for guiding and informing an integrated program of future research on start-up teams. By introducing a multidimensional conceptualization of start-up teams, we highlight the value of considering the defining ingredients of start-up teams for furthering a stronger paradigm.Keywords
This publication has 160 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relational Pluralism in De Novo Organizations: Boards of Directors as Bridges or Barriers to Diverse Alliance Portfolios?The Academy of Management Journal, 2014
- Arriving at the Starting Line: The Impact of Community and Financial Logics on New Banking VenturesThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team DescriptionAcademy of Management Review, 2012
- Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture PerformanceJournal of Management, 2011
- The Relationship Between Knowledge Transfer, Top Management Team Composition, and Performance: The Case of Science–Based Entrepreneurial FirmsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011
- How Lead Founder Personality Affects New Venture PerformanceJournal of Management, 2011
- Network Analysis in the Social SciencesScience, 2009
- A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamismJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2007
- Entrepreneurial Team Formation: An Exploration of New Member AdditionEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006
- Taxonomic incommensurabilityInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1998