Comparison of procedure time between manual and electric vacuum aspiration for pregnancy termination between 10-14 weeks: A randomized trial
- 10 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contraception
- Vol. 113, 108-112
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vulnerability of the medical product supply chain: the wake-up call of COVID-19BMJ Quality & Safety, 2020
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partnersJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
- First-trimester aspiration abortion practices: a survey of United States abortion providersContraception, 2018
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first‐trimester abortion: a systematic reviewBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Early First-Trimester Abortion: A Controlled Study of Complication RatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trialContraception, 2003
- Similarities in women’s perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortionContraception, 2003
- Manual Vacuum Aspiration for First-Trimester AbortionArchives of Family Medicine, 1998
- Vacuum aspiration with the IPAS Modified Gynecologic SyringeContraception, 1983