Many authors of publicly available top-selling nutrition books in Canada are without clinical nutrition credentials, do not cite evidence, and promote their own services or products
Open Access
- 1 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Vol. 47 (12), 1187-1193
- https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0051
Abstract
The accuracy of books as public nutrition resources varies substantially; whether authors of publicly available nutrition books possess related experience, cite scientific evidence, or have other financial incentives has not been assessed thoroughly. This study aimed to determine if publicly available top-selling nutrition books are written by authors who (1) have relevant expertise, (2) cite scientific evidence, and (3) benefit financially in other ways. Best-selling nutrition books were gathered from Amazon Canada. Differences in scientific citations and financial incentives were compared between authors with and without credentials. Authors who were Doctor of Medicine (MD), registered dietitians (RD), chiropractors (DC), or naturopathic doctors (ND) had more in-text citations (56% versus 25%, p=0.014) and cited more scientific articles (83% versus 50%, p=0.0045) compared to all other authors. The majority of authors of publicly-available top-selling nutrition books in Canada did not have MD/RD credentials. Many of the authors promoted their own services or products, regardless of credentials.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapersBMJ Open, 2017
- Health information seeking in the digital age: An analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adultsCogent Social Sciences, 2017
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015The Lancet, 2016
- A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy populationJournal of Communication in Healthcare, 2016
- General practitioners’ views on providing nutrition care to patients with chronic disease: a focus group studyJournal of Primary Health Care, 2016
- Nutrition Education in an Era of Global Obesity and DiabetesAcademic Medicine, 2015
- Enhancing the role of nutrition professionals in weight management: A cross-sectional surveyObesity, 2014
- Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical OverviewHealth Education & Behavior, 2007
- Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and Nutrition MisinformationJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2006
- Primary Sources of Health Information: Comparisons in the Domain of Health Attitudes, Health Cognitions, and Health BehaviorsHealth Communication, 2004