Beyond “Active Learning”: How the ICAP Framework Permits More Acute Examination of the Popular Peer Instruction Pedagogy
- 1 December 2019
- journal article
- Published by Harvard Education Publishing Group in Harvard Educational Review
- Vol. 89 (4), 611-634
- https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-89.4.611
Abstract
Peer Instruction, a pedagogy utilizing handheld classroom response technology to promote student discussion, is one of the most popular research-based instructional practices in STEM education. Yet, few studies have shed theoretical light on how and why Peer Instruction is effective. In this article, J. Bryan Henderson explores the Peer Instruction technique through a controlled methodology where theory—in this case the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework for differentiating various modes of cognitive engagement—drives pedagogical adaptations that serve as the differing experimental conditions. He finds that among the four high school physics classes he studied which employed Peer Instruction, the students achieved learning gains that, when normalizing for pretest performance, on average were more than 10 percent greater than those of college students not exposed to the ICAP-driven methodology when learning introductory physics. This article serves as an example to the educational research community of how the ICAP framework can help illuminate theoretical mechanisms behind instructional techniques in ways the more general use of the term active learning cannot.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept QuestionsCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2011
- Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction?CBE—Life Sciences Education, 2010
- Comparison of the effectiveness of collaborative groups and peer instruction in a large introductory physics course for science majorsCanadian Journal of Physics, 2010
- Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United StatesPhysical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2009
- Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovationsAmerican Journal of Physics, 2008
- Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroomAmerican Journal of Physics, 2006
- Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of ClassroomsThe Physics Teacher, 2002
- The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory studyScience Education, 2000
- Who needs physics education research!?American Journal of Physics, 1998
- Force concept inventoryThe Physics Teacher, 1992