Quality assessment of Dobson spectrophotometers for ozone column measurements before and after automation at Arosa and Davos
Open Access
- 7 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 14 (6), 4203-4217
- https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4203-2021
Abstract
The longest ozone column measurement series are based on the Dobson sun spectrophotometers developed in the 1920s by Gordon B. W. Dobson. These instruments still constitute an important part of the World Meteorological Organization's global network due to their optical qualities and ruggedness. The primary drawback of this instrument is the effort needed for its manual operation. In industrialized and some less developed countries, most stations have made the choice to replace the Dobson by the automated Brewer sun spectrophotometers, but some are still relying on the Dobson instrument. One of them is the Arosa station where both instrument types are run in parallel. Here, an automated version of the Dobson instrument was developed and implemented recently. In the present paper, the results of the analysis of simultaneous measurements from pairs of Dobson instruments that were either collocated at Arosa or Davos or operated one at each location are presented for four distinct time periods: 1992–2012 – manual vs. manual operation of collocated Dobson instruments (MMC); 2012–2013 – manual vs. automated operation of collocated Dobson instruments (MAC); 2012–2019 – automated vs. automated operation of collocated Dobson instruments (AAC); 2016–2019 – automated vs. automated operation of distant Dobson instruments (AAD). The direct comparison of two instruments using the standard operation procedure during the MMC period gives a metric necessary to validate the automated version of Dobson instruments. The direct comparison of two collocated instruments using the standard manual operation procedure reveals random differences of coincident observations with a standard deviation of ∼ 0.45 % and monthly mean differences between −1.0 % and +0.8 %. In most cases the observed biases are not statistically significant. The same analysis of two automated Dobson instruments yields significantly smaller standard deviation of ∼ 0.25 % and biases of between −0.7 % and 0.8 %. This demonstrates that the repeatability has improved with the automation, while the systematic differences are only marginally smaller. The analysis of the AAD period of coincident measurements from the distant sites Arosa and Davos reveals a small positive bias (not significant) compatible with the 250 m altitude difference. The description of the automated data acquisition and control of the Dobson instrument is presented in a separate paper (Stübi et al., 2020).Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of the out-of-band stray light on the retrieval of the Umkehr Dobson ozone profilesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009
- The Brewer reference triadGeophysical Research Letters, 2005
- Total ozone observations prior to the IGY. I: A historyQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2003
- Total ozone series at Arosa (Switzerland): Homogenization and data comparisonPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,1998
- Total ozone measurements made with the Brewer ozone spectrophotometer during STOIC 1989Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995
- Recent developments of the Light Climatic Observatory—ozone measuring station of the Swiss Meteorological Institute (LKO) at ArosaJournal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 1992
- The Ultraviolet Cross-Sections of Ozone: I. The MeasurementsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1985
- An update of the Arosa ozone series to the present using a statistical instrument calibrationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1984
- An automated Dobson spectrophotometerPure and Applied Geophysics, 1973
- Forty Years’ Research on Atmospheric Ozone at Oxford: a HistoryApplied Optics, 1968