A Cautionary Note Regarding Multilevel Factor Score Estimates from Lavaan
Open Access
- 9 January 2023
- Vol. 5 (1), 38-49
- https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5010004
Abstract
To compute factor score estimates, lavaan version 0.6–12 offers the function lavPredict( ) that can not only be applied in single-level modeling but also in multilevel modeling, where characteristics of higher-level units such as working environments or team leaders are often assessed by ratings of employees. Surprisingly, the function provides results that deviate from the expected ones. Specifically, whereas the function yields correct EAP estimates of higher-level factors, the ML estimates are counterintuitive and possibly incorrect. Moreover, the function does not provide the expected standard errors. I illustrate these issues using an example from organizational research where team leaders are evaluated by their employees, and I discuss these issues from a measurement perspective.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: Accuracy–bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models.Psychological Methods, 2011
- The Role of Sample Cluster Means in Multilevel ModelsMethodology, 2011
- Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modelingContemporary Educational Psychology, 2009
- The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies.Psychological Methods, 2008
- Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: A latent variable multilevel model.Psychological Methods, 2007
- People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling.Psychological Methods, 2005
- Regression among factor scoresPsychometrika, 2001
- The Generalizability of Class MeansReview of Educational Research, 1977
- THE STATISTICAL CONCEPTION OF MENTAL FACTORSThe British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1937
- THE MEANING OF ‘i’ IN THE ESTIMATE OF ‘g’The British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1934