Is deterrence approach effective in combating tax evasion? A meta-analysis
Open Access
- 25 April 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by LLC CPC Business Perspectives in Problems and Perspectives in Management
- Vol. 17 (2), 93-113
- https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.07
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a meta-analysis of the relationship between determinant factors and tax evasion based on deterrence approach. Using the meta-analysis method, each statistical result of empirical studies is converted into r-pearson as standardized effect size, and then synthesized into a mean effect size in order to increase power and to resolve uncertainty. Theoretically, increasing audit, tax rate and tax penalty will decrease tax evasion. However, the results show that only tax rate has a significant impact on tax evasion. Synthesizing totally 478 outcomes from articles published between 1978 and 2018, there is a robust conclusion that decreasing tax rate is an effective tool in combating tax evasion. On the other hand, audit and penalty are not significant in influencing tax evasion. In addition, the results of heterogeneity analysis suggest that national culture and income level of the country are useful in explaining the impact of audit, tax rate and tax penalty on tax evasion. These findings should be of interest to policymakers. First, instead of sacrificing more resources in conducting audit or imposing more penalty, tax authorities should consider setting the tax rate as low as possible to diminish tax evasion. Second, considering that culture and income level influence the impact of audit and penalty on tax evasion, policymakers should consider national cultural values and income level condition when designing audit techniques and setting penalty structures.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Government Spending Affect Income Poverty? A Meta-regression AnalysisWorld Development, 2018
- When You Know Your Neighbour Pays Taxes: Information, Peer Effects and Tax ComplianceFiscal Studies, 2017
- Regulatory performance of audit tournaments and compliance observabilityEuropean Economic Review, 2016
- Tax Uncertainty and Voluntary Real-Time Tax AuditsThe Accounting Review, 2013
- Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation11This paper is based on a keynote address at the conference “The Shadow Economy, Tax Evasion and Money Laundering” held in Münster, Germany at the University of Münster in July 2011.Economic Analysis and Policy, 2012
- DETERRENCE AND MORAL PERSUASION EFFECTS ON CORPORATE TAX COMPLIANCE: FINDINGS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL*Criminology, 2012
- Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studiesInternational Tax and Public Finance, 2011
- Tax evasion as ade facto vote of disapproval of PAC contributionsAtlantic Economic Journal, 2003
- Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax ComplianceKyklos, 1995
- Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysisJournal of Public Economics, 1972