Toxin-Antitoxin Systems - A New Player in Morphological Transformation of Antibiotic-Exposed Helicobacter pylori?

Abstract

The recently published original article by Mortaji et al. (2020) characterized for the first time the function of a type I toxin-antitoxin (TA) system in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. It was found that the high expression of an AapA1 toxin, which is part of this system, causes a drastic decrease in the amount of culturable H. pylori cells and their transformation from a spiral to a coccoid morphotype. It was also established that AapA1 is a hydrophobic peptide disrupting cell division and that oxidative stress is an inducer of the toxin expression. The development of genomics and bioinformatics in recent years has contributed to the discovery of a high frequency of TA systems in microorganisms, which was a strong stimulus for the intensification of research on their structure and function (Lee and Lee, 2016; Yang and Walsh, 2017). Prokaryotic TA modules are genetic elements that encode information about a toxin involved in inhibiting growth of the bacterial producer and an antitoxin that counteracts the activity of the former. Toxins belonging to TA systems restrict microbial replication by targeting key processes for cell physiology, including replication, transcription, translation and/or cell wall synthesis (Harms et al., 2018). Attention is being paid increasingly to the participation of these systems in suppressing the microbial multiplication and the stimulatory effect on adaptation to stressful conditions, i.e., nutritional starvation, exposure to antimicrobial substances or immune system cells’ attack (Lee and Lee, 2016; Yang and Walsh, 2017). To date, five type II TA systems of H. pylori have been identified. These include chromosomally encoded HP0892-HP0893 (Han et al., 2013), HP0894-HP0895 (Han et al., 2011), HP0315-HP0316 (Kwon et al., 2012), and HP0967-HP0968 (Cárdenas-Mondragón et al., 2016), and the newly identified TfiT-TfiA (Boampong et al., 2020), which is encoded on mobile genetic fragments. The expression of toxins belonging to the above modules arrest the growth of bacterial producers and cause the reduction of their number (expressed in CFU/mL). Similar observations were made in 2017 by Arnion et al. (2017), who first identified the existence of the type I TA system in H. pylori (called AapA1-IsoA1), and noted that the expression of the toxin significantly decreases the amount of culturable H. pylori cells. At this point it is worth mentioning that Mortaji et al. (2020) deepened the knowledge related to the above phenomenon. They proved in their next original article that this decline was caused by a reduction in the culturability (observed as the optical density of the culture) but not the viability of H. pylori (preserved cell membrane integrity and a stable ATP level), and was accompanied by the transition of morphology from spiral to coccoidal (Mortaji et al., 2020). This observation is very valuable from the scientific point of view and confirms the postulates presented by our research group, pointing to difficulties in the correct interpretation of the H. pylori viability (understood as the sum of various cell parameters suggesting its physiological activity) and frequent mistakes made by scientists taking the culturability (detected by culture optical density or CFU/mL) as the only determinant of the viability of this pathogen (Krzyżek and Grande, 2020). An additional valuable cognitive element shown by Mortaji et al. (2020) was a proof that oxidative stress was an inducer of the aapA1 expression in H. pylori, and thus a trigger for the spiral-to-coccoid transition. Exposure to high concentrations of oxygen, understood here as oxidative stress, is a well-known stress factor for H. pylori determining its intensive transformation into spherical forms (Chuang et al., 2005; Zeng et al., 2008). Thus, Mortaji et al. (2020) neatly revealed a possible molecular mechanism governing this process. In regard to this, it is also worth paying attention to the results presented by many research teams that have shown that bactericidal antibiotics, unlike bacteriostatic ones, stimulate the formation of oxygen free radicals and oxidative stress in bacterial cells, regardless of their target site (Kohanski et al., 2007; Brynildsen et al., 2013; Dwyer et al., 2014; Belenky et al., 2015; Lobritz et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017). According to Lobritz et al. (2015), this effect was particularly visible with the use of antibiotics acting on the microbial cell wall and DNA, but neither translation nor transcription. The above information, in conjunction with the results provided by Mortaji et al. (2020), seem to be extremely interesting, as they may explain why bactericidal antibiotics (amoxicillin, levofloxacin or metronidazole) induce morphological transformation into spherical forms in H. pylori significantly faster than bacteriostatic antibiotics (Sörberg et al., 1997; Sörberg et al., 1998; Akada et al., 1999; Faghri et al., 2014; Krzyżek et al., 2019a; Krzyżek et al., 2019b). Still, it should be remembered that the process of cell death and/or formation of coccoids by H. pylori during the exposure to bactericidal antibiotics may depend on many factors simultaneously or be independent of oxidative stress. In the original article by Mortaji et al. (2020), H. pylori was exposed to one of two antibiotics: rifampicin or tetracycline targeting transcription or translation, respectively. The authors did not observe any significant increase in the aapA1 expression in rifampicin- or tetracycline-treated cells, concluding that exposure of H. pylori to antibiotics did not affect the expression of this toxin. In the light of the above presented deduction, however, it seems that divergent results may arise for other antibiotics used in the therapy of H. pylori, especially those with a strong bactericidal activity, e.g.,...