Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences
- 24 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 117 (50), 31738-31747
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010056117
Abstract
Navigating conflict is integral to decision-making, serving a central role both in the subjective experience of choice as well as contemporary theories of how we choose. However, the lack of a sensitive, accessible, and interpretable metric of conflict has led researchers to focus on choice itself rather than how individuals arrive at that choice. Using mouse-tracking—continuously sampling computer mouse location as participants decide—we demonstrate the theoretical and practical uses of dynamic assessments of choice from decision onset through conclusion. Specifically, we use mouse tracking to index conflict, quantified by the relative directness to the chosen option, in a domain for which conflict is integral: decisions involving risk. In deciding whether to accept risk, decision makers must integrate gains, losses, status quos, and outcome probabilities, a process that inevitably involves conflict. Across three preregistered studies, we tracked participants’ motor movements while they decided whether to accept or reject gambles. Our results show that 1) mouse-tracking metrics of conflict sensitively detect differences in the subjective value of risky versus certain options; 2) these metrics of conflict strongly predict participants’ risk preferences (loss aversion and decreasing marginal utility), even on a single-trial level; 3) these mouse-tracking metrics outperform participants’ reaction times in predicting risk preferences; and 4) manipulating risk preferences via a broad versus narrow bracketing manipulation influences conflict as indexed by mouse tracking. Together, these results highlight the importance of measuring conflict during risky choice and demonstrate the usefulness of mouse tracking as a tool to do so.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (1554837)
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- When conflicts are good: Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013
- The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex FunctionNeuron, 2013
- Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Non-conscious goal conflictsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011
- MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking methodBehavior Research Methods, 2010
- Motions of the Hand Expose the Partial and Parallel Activation of StereotypesPsychological Science, 2009
- Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision TasksNeural Computation, 2008
- Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointingJournal of Vision, 2006
- Correlation, conflict, and choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1993