Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change
Open Access
- 26 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
- Vol. 6 (1), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00312-2
Abstract
Visual search in dynamic environments, for example lifeguarding or CCTV monitoring, has several fundamentally different properties to standard visual search tasks. The visual environment is constantly moving, a range of items could become targets and the task is to search for a certain event. We developed a novel task in which participants were required to search static and moving displays for an orientation change thus capturing components of visual search, multiple object tracking and change detection paradigms. In Experiment 1, we found that the addition of moving distractors slowed participants’ response time to detect an orientation changes in a moving target, showing that the motion of distractors disrupts the rapid detection of orientation changes in a moving target. In Experiment 2 we found that, in displays of both moving and static objects, response time was slower if a moving object underwent a change than if a static object did, thus demonstrating that motion of the target itself also disrupts the detection of an orientation change. Our results could have implications for training in real-world occupations where the task is to search a dynamic environment for a critical event. Moreover, we add to the literature highlighting the need to develop lab-based tasks with high experimental control from any real-world tasks researchers may wish to investigate rather than extrapolating from static visual search tasks to more dynamic environments.Keywords
Funding Information
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M000885/1)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Suspiciousness perception in dynamic scenes: a comparison of CCTV operators and novicesFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013
- It’s Alive!Psychological Science, 2010
- Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object trackingJournal of Vision, 2010
- No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual searchPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009
- Selective nontarget inhibition in Multiple Object TrackingVisual Cognition, 2008
- Eye movements during multiple object tracking: Where do participants look?Cognition, 2008
- Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: The high-beams effectCognition, 2008
- Setting up the target template in visual searchJournal of Vision, 2005
- Multiple object tracking and attentional processing.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2000
- Measuring Preattentive Processes: When is Pop-out Not Enough?Visual Cognition, 1997