Integrated reporting in South Africa in 2012
Top Cited Papers
- 10 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Meditari Accountancy Research
- Vol. 23 (2), 197-221
- https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-07-2014-0047
Abstract
Purpose: – This paper aims to explore the initial reactions of the South African institutional investment community to the first sets of integrated reports being prepared by companies listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange. The research highlights a shift in attitude towards ESG and integrated reporting, initial views on the first sets of integrated reports and obstacles to the preparation of high-quality reports. The study also includes recommendations for preparers. Design/methodology/approach: – Detailed interviews are carried out with 20 experts from the South African institutional investment industry. Interpretive thematic analysis is used to identify themes and principles and construct an initial assessment of the investors’ views on South African integrated reporting. Findings: – The new reporting framework is seen as an improvement on the traditional annual report of South African listed companies. In general, there is more emphasis on non-financial measures and evidence of an effort to integrate financial and environmental, social and governance metrics to provide a better understanding of organisational sustainability. The length of reports, repetition and a check box approach to reporting does, however, detract from the usefulness of the reports and undermine the development of an integrated thinking ethos. Research limitations/implications: – The study is limited to exploring the views of only a single group of stakeholders at one point in time. The reader’s attention is also drawn to the fact that the study was carried out before the International Integrated Reporting Council’s framework for integrated reporting was applied by South African preparers. Nevertheless, its interpretive style allows identification of challenges to effective integrated reporting. Originality/value: – This paper is the first to examine the views of institutional investors and analysts on South African integrated reports. It makes an important contribution to the academic literature by adding to the limited body of research on integrated reporting and corporate governance in an African setting. The study is also important for practitioners seeking to improve the quality of their integrated reports and for academics wanting to understand the problems and possible strategies for addressing these.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Back to basics: What do we mean by environmental (and social) accounting and what is it for?—A reaction to ThorntonCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 2013
- Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planetAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2010
- Valuing external costs – from theory to practice: implications for full cost environmental accountingEuropean Accounting Review, 2004
- Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 2003
- Financial institutions, private acquisition of corporate information, and fund managementThe European Journal of Finance, 1998
- Private Voluntary Disclosure, Financial Intermediation and Market EfficiencyJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1998
- The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reportsAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1997
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- An Investigation of the Information Content of (Certain) Social Responsibility DisclosuresJournal of Accounting Research, 1978
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977