An R Function to Correct Fit Indices and Omnibus Tests in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
- 23 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
- Vol. 55 (1), 48-70
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2021.1906159
Abstract
The present study describes an R function that implements six corrective procedures developed by Bartlett, Swain, and Yuan in the correction of 21 statistics associated with the omnibus Chi-square test, the residuals, or fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM).Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using ΔGoodness-of-Fit Indexes in Assessing Mean Structure InvarianceStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
- Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelingPersonality and Individual Differences, 2007
- Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models!Personality and Individual Differences, 2007
- On the Large-Sample Bias, Variance, and Mean Squared Error of the Conventional Noncentrality Parameter Estimator of Covariance Structure ModelsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2000
- Performance of Modified Test Statistics in Covariance and Correlation Structure Analysis Under Conditions of Multivariate NonnormalityStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2000
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Parsimony‐based fit indices for multiple‐indicator models: Do they work?Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1994
- Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentralityJournal of Classification, 1989
- Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.Psychological Bulletin, 1988