Identifying Areas at Greatest Risk for Recent Zika Virus Importation — New York City, 2016
Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Currents
Abstract
Introduction: The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene sought to detect and minimize the risk of local, mosquito-borne Zika virus (ZIKV) transmission. We modeled areas at greatest risk for recent ZIKV importation, in the context of spatially biased ZIKV case ascertainment and no data on the local spatial distribution of persons arriving from ZIKV-affected countries. Methods: For each of 14 weeks during June-September 2016, we used logistic regression to model the census tract-level presence of any ZIKV cases in the prior month, using eight covariates from static sociodemographic census data and the latest surveillance data, restricting to census tracts with any ZIKV testing in the prior month. To assess whether the model discriminated better than random between census tracts with and without recent cases, we compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for each week’s fitted model versus an intercept-only model applied to cross-validated data. For weeks where the ROC contrast test was significant at P < 0.05, we output and mapped the model-predicted individual probabilities for all census tracts, including those with no recent testing. Results: The ROC contrast test was significant for 8 of 14 weekly analyses. No covariates were consistently associated with the presence of recent cases. Modeled risk areas fluctuated across these 8 weeks, with Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.30 to 0.93, all P < 0.0001. Areas in the Bronx and upper Manhattan were in the highest risk decile as of late June, while as of late August, the greatest risk shifted to eastern Brooklyn. Conclusion: We used observable characteristics of areas with recent, known travel-associated ZIKV cases to identify similar areas with no observed cases that might also be at-risk each week. Findings were used to target public education and Aedes spp. mosquito surveillance and control. These methods are applicable to other conditions for which biased case ascertainment is suspected and knowledge of how cases are geographically distributed is important for targeting public health activities.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disparities in Zika Virus Testing and Incidence Among Women of Reproductive Age—New York City, 2016Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2018
- Local environmental and meteorological conditions influencing the invasive mosquito Ae. albopictus and arbovirus transmission risk in New York CityPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2017
- Using a call center to coordinate Zika virus testing—New York City, 2016Journal of Emergency Management, 2016
- Mapping Zika in municipalities of one coastal department of Colombia (Sucre) using geographic information systems during the 2015–2016 outbreak: implications for public health and travel adviceInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2016
- Estimating risks of importation and local transmission of Zika virus infectionPeerJ, 2016
- Disparities in Reportable Communicable Disease Incidence by Census Tract-Level Poverty, New York City, 2006–2013American Journal of Public Health, 2015
- Zika Virus in Gabon (Central Africa) – 2007: A New Threat from Aedes albopictus?PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2014
- Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse): A Potential Vector of Zika Virus in SingaporePLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2013
- A Distributed Platform for Global-Scale Agent-Based Models of Disease TransmissionACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 2011
- Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research.American Journal of Public Health, 1982