Abstract
It has been five years since the Sewol sank off Jindo Island, South Jeolla Province, on April 16, 2014. In the wake of the Sewol ferry disaster, the Education Ministry emphasized the need to strengthen safety education for students that year, and announced a plan to support the expansion of student safety experience facilities in recognition of the limitations of providing hands-on education to all students. This is to help the city and provincial education offices expand safety experience facilities in order to foster students" safety awareness and ability to cope with crises in case of emergency through training focused on experience, and to support the construction of mobile experience facilities for students" safety education, classroom-type experience facilities using idle classrooms, and a comprehensive experience center for students" safety education. The construction of the safety experience center consists of two main facilities: the construction of an external facility for the experience center and the construction of a hands-on facility for the site. In general, the department in charge of student safety within the education office will carry out the overall project as well as the design and construction of internal exhibition facilities, while the department in charge of facility management, such as facilities, will be responsible for the construction of external facilities. The problem is that the construction of such a large-scale comprehensive safety experience center will be entrusted to a small number of public administration officials who do not have expertise in architecture and construction to review the appropriateness of wartime experiences designed and constructed by external service providers, or, in effect, by monitoring them. This can be seen as meaning that internal management and review of technical guidance for construction control, quality control, and safety management of wartime experiences are in a situation where it is impossible. It is necessary to prevent accidents that occur during construction and to ensure quality, completeness and safety when problems such as structural changes or design changes occur through a plan that professionally supervises the process during the construction of the exhibition experience in the future. In this regard, it is persuasive in the sense that a special review of the proper design, construction, etc. of the exhibition experience can be made of the countermeasures for reviewing the appropriateness of the exhibition experience. In addition, for a more faithful and safety-guaranteed review of the adequacy of wartime experiences, it is necessary to place the supervision provision for exhibits under the Basic Act on Disaster and Safety Management or the Construction Technology Promotion Act. If these regulations are newly established, the practice of relying entirely on the company after hearing the description of the wartime experience service provider can be corrected, and, above all, the legal basis for the exhibition experience, the facility for training to ensure life, body and safety.