Retrospective Evaluation of the Vulnerability of Watershed Sustainable Water Development Using a Time-Series-Based Space Geometry Model: Xiang Jiang Watershed, China
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
- Vol. 26 (9), 05021023
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0002118
Abstract
The ability to retrospectively evaluate the vulnerability of a watershed can identify potential risks influencing sustainable water development over time. More importantly, the effect of watershed management policies can be evaluated to help government assess and improve current policies. In order to identify vulnerability factors and evaluate the vulnerability state of a watershed, this paper proposes a time-series-based vulnerability analysis framework that integrates several approaches and methods, including: (1) a combined driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) and hydrology-environment-life (HEL) framework for the selection and classification of evaluation parameters; (2) the coefficient of variation method to determine the weights of the evaluation parameters; and (3) the space geometry model to determine the vulnerability level. In addition, the paper describes a robustness analysis that was performed to evaluate the impact of changing the evaluation parameters on the results. A case study of the Xiang Jiang watershed in China is presented; empirical analysis showed that hydrologic vulnerability experienced large interannual variations. The environmental vulnerability of the Xiang Jiang watershed is subject to a high level of risk, whereas the living vulnerability is subject to a low level of risk. Despite many challenges, Xiang Jiang watershed water development is sustainable; this was determined based on the decreasing trend of total vulnerability. The findings demonstrated the effectiveness of the local government’s policies for watershed management. Moreover, the results of the robustness analysis showed that the proposed vulnerability analysis framework was adaptable to using slightly different evaluation parameters in cases in which data for the proposed parameters are not readily available. The proposed framework can be used by local governments and decision makers to effectively manage the sustainable development of watersheds.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping urban resilience to disasters – A reviewSustainable Cities and Society, 2019
- Vulnerability assessment of urban power grid based on combination evaluationSafety Science, 2018
- Multi-dimensional assessment of drought vulnerability in Africa: 1960–2100Science of The Total Environment, 2018
- Ecological vulnerability indicatorsEcological Indicators, 2016
- A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability of Katri Watershed, Dhanbad, IndiaModeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2015
- Using multiple-criteria decision-making techniques for eco-environmental vulnerability assessment: a case study on the Chi-Jia-Wan Stream watershed, TaiwanEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009
- Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources Systems in the Eastern Nile BasinWater Resources Management, 2009
- The Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index: An Integrated Assessment Tool for Community Resilience and Vulnerability with Respect to FreshwaterEnvironmental Management, 2008
- An Integrated Indicator Based on Basin Hydrology, Environment, Life, and Policy: The Watershed Sustainability IndexWater Resources Management, 2006
- Population Evacuation: Assessing Spatial Variability in Geophysical Risk and Social Vulnerability to Natural HazardsNatural Hazards Review, 2005