Evaluating methods for debris-flow prediction based on rainfall in an Alpine catchment
Open Access
- 10 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 21 (9), 2773-2789
- https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2773-2021
Abstract
The prediction of debris flows is relevant because this type of natural hazard can pose a threat to humans and infrastructure. Debris-flow (and landslide) early warning systems often rely on rainfall intensity–duration (ID) thresholds. Multiple competing methods exist for the determination of such ID thresholds but have not been objectively and thoroughly compared at multiple scales, and a validation and uncertainty assessment is often missing in their formulation. As a consequence, updating, interpreting, generalizing and comparing rainfall thresholds is challenging. Using a 17-year record of rainfall and 67 debris flows in a Swiss Alpine catchment (Illgraben), we determined ID thresholds and associated uncertainties as a function of record duration. Furthermore, we compared two methods for rainfall definition based on linear regression and/or true-skill-statistic maximization. The main difference between these approaches and the well-known frequentist method is that non-triggering rainfall events were also considered for obtaining ID-threshold parameters. Depending on the method applied, the ID-threshold parameters and their uncertainties differed significantly. We found that 25 debris flows are sufficient to constrain uncertainties in ID-threshold parameters to ±30 % for our study site. We further demonstrated the change in predictive performance of the two methods if a regional landslide data set with a regional rainfall product was used instead of a local one with local rainfall measurements. Hence, an important finding is that the ideal method for ID-threshold determination depends on the available landslide and rainfall data sets. Furthermore, for the local data set we tested if the ID-threshold performance can be increased by considering other rainfall properties (e.g. antecedent rainfall, maximum intensity) in a multivariate statistical learning algorithm based on decision trees (random forest). The highest predictive power was reached when the peak 30 min rainfall intensity was added to the ID variables, while no improvement was achieved by considering antecedent rainfall for debris-flow predictions in Illgraben. Although the increase in predictive performance with the random forest model over the classical ID threshold was small, such a framework could be valuable for future studies if more predictors are available from measured or modelled data.This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sedimentNature Geoscience, 2010
- Rainfall thresholds for the possible occurrence of landslides in ItalyNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2010
- Predicting the probability and volume of postwildfire debris flows in the intermountain western United StatesGSA Bulletin, 2009
- Identifying individual rain events from pluviograph records: a review with analysis of data from an Australian dryland siteHydrological Processes, 2008
- Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern EuropeArchiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie Serie A, 2007
- Experimental evidences and numerical modelling of debris flow initiated by channel runoffLandslides, 2005
- The initiation of debris flow at high slopes: experimental resultsJournal of Hydraulic Research, 2000
- The physics of debris flowsReviews of Geophysics, 1997
- Debris FlowAnnual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1981
- The numerical measure of the success of predictionsScience, 1884