What counts as evidence? Swimming against the tide: Valuing both clinically informed experimentally controlled case series and randomized controlled trials in intervention research
- 11 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
- Vol. 13 (3), 107-135
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1597444
Abstract
Research into intervention with people with speech and language needs often takes the form of single-case/case series experimental studies (SCEDs) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This paper explores the nature of these designs, including their strengths/weaknesses and highlights the value of understanding the intervention outcomes for individual participants. An online survey gathered information on speech and language therapists’ views on their use of the different research designs. We conclude that both research designs are used to inform practice. SCEDs, in particular, are used in developing theories of intervention and informing therapy with individuals. Sound experimental intervention studies of both designs are needed.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CE110001021)
- Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT120100102)
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-2721)
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phonological and orthographic cueing therapy: A case of generalised improvementAphasiology, 2010
- Understanding high quality research designs for speech language pathologyEvidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2008
- Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basisAphasiology, 2008
- Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and the state of the scienceJournal of Communication Disorders, 2006
- Effects of Semantic Treatment on Verbal Communication and Linguistic Processing in Aphasia After StrokeStroke, 2004
- Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effectsAphasiology, 2002
- Designing Single Case Treatment Studies for Aphasic PatientsNeuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1997
- Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introductionAphasiology, 1996
- Generalization of naming after picture/word matching tasks: Only items appearing in therapy benefitAphasiology, 1993
- Determining Optimal Therapy — Randomized Trials in Individual PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1986