Survey of Saudi urology program directors: What do you look for in a candidate?
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Urology Annals
- Vol. 13 (3), 272-276
- https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_146_20
Abstract
Introduction: Prospective urology applicants in Saudi Arabia must go through a rigorous matching process. Defining which aspects of an applicant's portfolio or interview will get them matched is difficult. Our objective is to provide information on which aspects of an application are the most important. Subjects and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an electronic survey was sent out to all urology program directors (PD). The survey included 27 items from an application that were rated by the respondent using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Twenty-three urology PD completed the survey (79.3% response rate). Most of the PD subspecialized in endourology and minimally invasive surgery. The three most important aspects as perceived by all responding PD were as follows: performance during rotation at the respondent's centre, publications in urology, and the total number of electives in urology. The three least important factors were as follows: presentations in fields other than urology, recommendation letters from nonurologists, and quality reference letters from nonurologists. Conclusion: Performance during rotations has been shown in our and other studies to be one of the most important factors in an application. Surveying PD on what they value the most in an applicant, provides valuable information and more transparency regarding the match processes. We also recommend that our colleagues from different specialties conduct similar studies.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey of Canadian urology programs: Which aspects of the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) application are the most important?Canadian Urological Association Journal, 2020
- Pre-residency publication and its association with paediatric residency match outcome—a retrospective analysis of a national databasePerspectives on Medical Education, 2017
- The Effect of Applicant Publication Volume on the Orthopaedic Residency MatchJournal of Surgical Education, 2016
- Do audition electives impact match success?Medical Education Online, 2016
- Program Directors' Criteria for Selection Into Urology ResidencyUrology, 2015
- Attitude and perception of urology by medical students at the end of their medical school: An appraisal from Saudi ArabiaUrology Annals, 2015
- Predictors of Success in a Urology Residency ProgramJournal of Surgical Education, 2013
- Selection Criteria for Residency: Results of a National Program Directors SurveyAcademic Medicine, 2009
- How competitive is my surgical specialty?The American Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Comparing postgraduate medical education at university and non-university hospitals in JapanAcademic Medicine, 1992