Comparison of reliability and repeatability of corneal curvature assessment with six keratometers
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
- Vol. 99 (6), 583-589
- https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12329
Abstract
When considering MSE alone IOLMaster, Pentacam, OPD scan and Medmont may be considered interchangeable; however, assessment of astigmatism shows greater variability between instruments, sessions and observers.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of corneal astigmatism measurements of 2 optical biometer models for toric intraocular lens selectionJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2015
- Prediction of Residual Astigmatism After Cataract Surgery Using Swept Source Fourier Domain Optical Coherence TomographyCurrent Eye Research, 2014
- Comparison of Automated and Partial Coherence Keratometry and Resulting Choice of Toric IOLOptometry and Vision Science, 2013
- Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologiesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2012
- Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal powerClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2012
- Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: Comparative study of normal eyesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009
- The fourth New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey: 2007Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2008
- A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometryBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Toric intraocular lenses: Correcting astigmatism while controlling axis shiftJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1994