Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies
Open Access
- 14 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6708-8
Abstract
We performed a pooled analysis of the COMPARZ study assessing efficacy and safety of pazopanib versus sunitinib in treatment-naïve Chinese patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (a/mRCC). In the COMPARZ study, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pazopanib 800 mg once daily (QD) continuously or sunitinib 50 mg QD in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS and ORR were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) and local investigators. Of the 209 Chinese patients (pazopanib, [n = 109] and sunitinib, [n = 100]), 155 (74%) were males and median age was 57 years (range, 18–79). Median PFS was 13.9 months for pazopanib versus 14.3 months for sunitinib per investigator assessment and 8.3 months in both arms per IRC assessment; PFS hazard ratio was 1.17 (investigator) and 0.99 (IRC). Median OS was not reached in pazopanib arm and was 29.5 months in sunitinib arm. ORR was significantly higher in pazopanib arm versus sunitinib arm (investigator: 41% versus 23% [P = 0.0052]; IRC: 35% versus 20% [P = 0.0203]). Pazopanib was generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with a/mRCC. Most frequent AEs in the pazopanib arm were diarrhea and hair color changes whereas the most frequent AEs in the sunitinib arm were decreased platelets, decreased neutrophil count, and thrombocytopenia. The results of the pooled analysis were consistent with the overall population in the COMPARZ study, and confirmed similar PFS and OS of pazopanib and sunitinib in the Chinese patients. clinical trials.gov, NCT00720941 (August 14, 2008) and NCT01147822 (May 19, 2010).Keywords
Funding Information
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Renal-Cell CarcinomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factorsBMC Cancer, 2017
- Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for long-term survival in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a single-center retrospective studyOncotarget, 2015
- Targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma in Chinese patients: focus on everolimusOncoTargets and Therapy, 2015
- Efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: initial experience in two Chinese centers.2014
- Pazopanib versus Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal-Cell CarcinomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Management of sunitinib adverse events in renal cell carcinoma patients: The Asian experienceAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Sunitinib for Asian Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparable Efficacy with Different Toxicity ProfilesOncology, 2011
- Renal cell carcinoma: treatment optionsBritish Journal of Nursing, 2011
- Safety and efficacy of sunitinib for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: an expanded-access trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2009