Are Residents’ Decisions Influenced More by a Decision Aid or a Specialist’s Opinion? A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 30 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 25 (4), 316-320
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1251-y
Abstract
Physicians are reluctant to use decision aids despite their ability to improve care. A potential reason may be that physicians do not believe decision aid advice. To determine whether internal medicine residents lend more credence to contradictory decision aid or human advice. Randomized controlled trial. Residents read a scenario of a patient with community-acquired pneumonia and were asked whether they would admit the patient to the intensive care unit or the floor. Residents were randomized to receive contrary advice from either a referenced decision aid or an anonymous pulmonologist. They were then asked, in light of this new information, where they would admit the patient. One hundred eight internal medicine residents. The percentage of residents who changed their admission location and the change in confidence in the decision. Residents were more likely to change their original admission location (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.04 to 5.1, P = 0.04) and to reduce their confidence in the decision (adjusted difference between means −12.9%, 95% CI −3.0% to −22.8%, P = 0.011) in response to the referenced decision aid than to the anonymous pulmonologist. Confidence in their decision was more likely to change if they initially chose to admit the patient to the floor. In a hypothetical case of community-acquired pneumonia, physicians were influenced more by contrary advice from a referenced decision aid than an anonymous specialist. Whether this holds for advice from a respected specialist or in actual practice remains to be studied.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of PhysiciansThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- The Influence of a Physician's Use of a Diagnostic Decision Aid on the Malpractice Verdicts of Mock JurorsMedical Decision Making, 2008
- Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Assisted Diagnostic AidMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- Evaluating informatics applications—clinical decision support systems literature reviewInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2001
- A diagnostic support system in general practice: Is it feasible?International Journal of Medical Informatics, 1997
- Hemodynamic Assessment in Managing the Critically IIIMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Can computer aided teaching packages improve clinical care in patients with acute abdominal pain?BMJ, 1991
- Diagnostic Yield of the Autopsy in a University Hospital and a Community HospitalThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Medical Information Management: Improving the Transfer of Research Results to Presurgical EvaluationMedical Care, 1983