A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study
Open Access
- 18 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 46 (5), 2323-2332
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w
Abstract
Background This study presents a classification system and treatment method to correct Rectus diastasis (RD) during abdominoplasty. Materials and methods One hundred and sixty seven patients undergoing abdominoplasty were enrolled between April 2014 and January 2018. Forty-three patients did not present with RD and were excluded from the analysis. Mean age was 40.32 years, mean BMI was 23.84, and minimum follow-up was 24 months. A four-type (A: mild 2–3cm, B: moderate 3–5cm, C: severe 5–7cm, and D: very severe 7–9cm) classification system is described. A different treatment method is performed in each category using continuous and interrupted absorbable sutures. Postoperatively patients filled up a questionnaire that involved the level of pain, the postoperative day they performed specific indoor/outdoor activities, and the evaluation of the aesthetic result. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between the four RD types regarding pain, complications, and return to specific activities. All types of RD had the same low rate complication profile. The seroma rate was 0.81%. The infection rate was 0.81%, and the thromboembolism and the pneumonic embolism rate was 0%. After 2–6 years of follow-up no clinical recurrence of rectus diastasis was observed. All reoperations (14.52%) were performed due to scar deformities. Mean pain score levels were very low (<1.5) and within a week most patients returned to specific indoor and outdoor activities. Most patients were extremely satisfied with the results. Conclusions In this article, we present an updated classification system and treatment protocol to provide surgeons a safe and standardized method that produces high-quality aesthetic results. Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ventilatory Function and Intra-abdominal Pressure in Patients Who Underwent Abdominoplasty with Plication of the External Oblique AponeurosisAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2013
- Assessment of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Plastic Surgery Patients Using the 2005 and 2010 Caprini Risk ScorePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Abdominal Musculoaponeuretic SystemPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Anesthesia in AbdominoplastiesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous womenClinical Anatomy, 2009
- Diastasis Recti: Clinical AnatomyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008
- Ropivacaine versus Lidocaine in Digital Nerve Blocks: A Prospective StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007
- Increased Intraabdominal Pressure in Abdominoplasty: Delineation of Risk FactorsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007
- Iatrogenic Parotid Sialocele following Rhytidectomy: Diagnosis and TreatmentPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- Nylon versus Polydioxanone in the Correction of Rectus DiastasisPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001