Comparative Hemodynamic Evaluation of the LUCAS® Device and Manual Chest Compression in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Open Access
- 1 March 2017
- journal article
- Published by Heighten Science Publications Corporation
- Vol. 2 (1), 016-024
- https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcicm.1001005
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational studyThe Lancet, 2012
- Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCOCritical Care Research and Practice, 2011
- Medical pre-hospital management reduces mortality in severe blunt trauma: a prospective epidemiological studyCritical Care, 2011
- Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigsBMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2010
- Effect of the AutoPulse™ automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitationIntensive Care Medicine, 2010
- Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Heart Failure Subjects on Circulatory SupportAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2009
- Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in an out-of-hospital setting: an observational studyEmergency Medicine Journal, 2009
- Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitation, 2005
- Significance of End-Tidal Pco2 Response to Exercise and Its Relation to Functional Capacity in Patients With Chronic Heart FailureSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2001
- Decay in Quality of Closed-Chest Compressions Over TimeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995