Cost-Effectiveness of 4 Specialized Nutritious Foods in the Prevention of Stunting and Wasting in Children Aged 6–23 Months in Burkina Faso: A Geographically Randomized Trial
Open Access
- 1 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Current Developments in Nutrition
- Vol. 4 (2), nzaa006
- https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa006
Abstract
Background: There is a variety of specialized nutritious foods available for use in programs targeting undernutrition, but evidence supporting the choice of product is limited. Objectives: We compared the cost-effectiveness of 4 specialized nutritious foods to prevent stunting and wasting in children aged 6-23 mo in Burkina Faso. Methods: Four geographic regions were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 intervention arms: Corn-Soy Blend Plus (CSB+) programmed with separate fortified vegetable oil (the reference food), Corn-Soy-Whey Blend (CSWB; a new formulation) with oil, SuperCereal Plus (SC+), and ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF). We compared the effects of each intervention arm on growth (length-for-age z score (LAZ), weight-for-length z score (WLZ), end-line stunting (LAZ < -2), and total monthly measurements of wasting (WLZ < -2). Rations were similar to 500 kcal/d, distributed monthly. Children were enrolled in the blanket supplementary feeding program at age similar to 6 mo and measured monthly for similar to 18 mo. Average costs per child reached were linked with effectiveness to compare the cost-effectiveness of each arm with CSB+ with oil. Results: In our sample of 6112 children (CSB+, n = 1519; CSWB, n = 1503; SC+, n = 1564; RUSF, n = 1526), none of the foods prevented declines in growth. Children in the SC+ and RUSF arms were not significantly different than those in the CSB+ with oil arm. Children in the CSWB with oil arm experienced higher end-line (measurement at age 22.9-23.9 mo) stunting (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.46, 2.94) and more months of wasting (incidence rate ratio: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.51). CSB+ with oil was the least-expensive ration in all costing scenarios ($113-131 2018 US dollars/enrolled child) and similar in effectiveness to SC+ and RUSF, and thus the most cost-effective product for the defined purposes. Conclusions: CSB+ with oil was the most cost-effective ration in the prevention of wasting and stunting in this trial. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02071563.Keywords
Funding Information
- United States Agency for International Development (AID-OAA-C-16-00020)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of complementary feeding with lipid‐based nutrient supplements and corn–soy blend on the incidence of stunting and linear growth among 6‐ to 18‐month‐old infants and children in rural MalawiMaternal & Child Nutrition, 2015
- Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements: How Can They Combat Child Malnutrition?PLoS Medicine, 2012
- The Effect of Adding Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food to a General Food Distribution on Child Nutritional Status and Morbidity: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled TrialPLoS Medicine, 2012
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2012
- Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a soybean-maize-sorghum–based ready-to-use complementary food paste on infant growth in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of CongoThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2012
- Worldwide Timing of Growth Faltering: Revisiting Implications for InterventionsPEDIATRICS, 2010
- What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survivalThe Lancet, 2008
- Nutrition, Growth, and Complementary Feeding of The Brestfed InfantPediatric Clinics of North America, 2001
- Formation of volatile compounds in whey protein concentrate during elevated temperature storage as a function of water activityInternational Dairy Journal, 1996
- Off-flavors of whey protein concentrates: A literature reviewInternational Dairy Journal, 1991