Ultra-Processing or Oral Processing? A Role for Energy Density and Eating Rate in Moderating Energy Intake from Processed Foods
Open Access
- 10 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Current Developments in Nutrition
- Vol. 4 (3), nzaa019
- https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa019
Abstract
Recent observational data and a controlled in-patient crossover feeding trial show that consumption of “ultra-processed foods” (UPFs), as defined by the NOVA classification system, is associated with higher energy intake, adiposity, and at a population level, higher prevalence of obesity. A drawback of the NOVA classification is the lack of evidence supporting a causal mechanism for why UPFs lead to overconsumption of energy. In a recent study by Hall the energy intake rate in the UPF condition (48 kcal/min) was >50% higher than in the unprocessed condition (31 kcal/min). Extensive empirical evidence has shown the impact that higher energy density has on increasing ad libitum energy intake and body weight. A significant body of research has shown that consuming foods at higher eating rates is related to higher energy intake and a higher prevalence of obesity. Energy density can be combined with eating rate to create a measure of energy intake rate (kcal/min), providing an index of a food's potential to promote increased energy intake. The current paper compared the association between measured energy intake rate and level of processing as defined by the NOVA classification. Data were pooled from 5 published studies that measured energy intake rates across a total sample of 327 foods. We show that going from unprocessed, to processed, to UPFs that the average energy intake rate increases from 35.5 ± 4.4, to 53.7 ± 4.3, to 69.4 ± 3.1 kcal/min (P < 0.05). However, within each processing category there is wide variability in the energy intake rate. We conclude that reported relations between UPF consumption and obesity should account for differences in energy intake rates when comparing unprocessed and ultra-processed diets. Future research requires well-controlled human feeding trials to establish the causal mechanisms for why certain UPFs can promote higher energy intake.Keywords
Funding Information
- Biomedical Science Institute (H/18/01/a0/B11)
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Food Viscosity on Eating Rate, Subjective Appetite, Glycemic Response and Gastric Emptying RatePLOS ONE, 2013
- Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiationAppetite, 2013
- Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time mealAppetite, 2013
- Texture and satiation: The role of oro-sensory exposure timePhysiology & Behavior, 2012
- Both Longer Oral Sensory Exposure to and Higher Intensity of Saltiness Decrease Ad Libitum Food Intake in Healthy Normal-Weight MenJournal of Nutrition, 2011
- Energetic consequences of thermal and nonthermal food processingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Slow food, fast food and the control of food intakeNature Reviews Endocrinology, 2010
- Identification of an Obese Eating Style in 4‐year‐old Children Born at High and Low Risk for ObesityObesity, 2010
- Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in childrenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008
- Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adultsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2007