Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (3), 847
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030847
Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak emerged as an ongoing crisis at the beginning of the year 2020. Its horrific manifestation at the community level significantly affects various dimensions of the quality of life (QoL) of all individuals. The study aimed to examine some of the predictors of the QoL during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional online survey questionnaire was used to gather data on the participants’ sociodemographic backgrounds, physical health status, psychological reactions, and QoL. We adapted 12 items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments (WHOQOL-BREF) to assess the QoL. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) was used to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. The median and inter-quartile range were used to describe the QoL scores. A multinomial regression analysis was computed between QoL score quartiles and associated factors, and the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The results of the multinomial regression analysis demonstrated that males (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.31–2.94); participants aged 26 to 35 years (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.33–19.37); non-Saudi participants (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.06–2.57); individuals with chronic diseases (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.33–3.48); those who lost their job (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.04–4.57); and those with depression (OR = 5.70; 95% CI = 3.59–9.05), anxiety (OR = 5.47; 95% CI = 3.38–8.84), and stress (OR = 6.55; 95% CI = 4.01–10.70) were more likely to be in the first quartile of the QoL scores. While the full model predicting the total QoL score was statistically significant (R2 = 0.962, F (750, 753) = 16,705.4, p < 0.001), the three QoL dimensions explained 0.643, 0.283, and 0.036 of the variability in environmental, social, and religious/spiritual dimensions, respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced various aspects of individuals’ QoL, as well as their physical and psychological health. Community-based interventions are needed to mitigate the pandemic’s negative effects and enhance the health and QoL of the general population.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social media dialogues in a crisis: A mixed-methods approach to identifying publics on social mediaPublic Relations Review, 2018
- An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and lonelinessPublic Health, 2017
- Addressing the Needs of Children and Youth in the Context of War and Terrorism: the Technological FrontierCurrent Psychiatry Reports, 2017
- Impact of socioeconomic status and subjective social class on overall and health-related quality of lifeBMC Public Health, 2015
- Regional alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality in Great Britain: novel insights using retail sales dataBMC Public Health, 2015
- The reliability and validity of the short version of the WHO Quality of Life Instrument in an Arab general populationAnnals of Saudi Medicine, 2009
- Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitationsBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 2006
- Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndromeEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2005
- SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, CanadaEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2004
- The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health OrganizationSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1995