Present and Future Sustainability Development of 3D Metal Printing
Open Access
- 8 August 2021
- journal article
- Published by Modestum Ltd in European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
- Vol. 5 (3), em0168
- https://doi.org/10.21601/ejosdr/11132
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing is a relatively new concept and promising technology for industrial production. It is important to investigate the environmental impact of the AM process in light of the environmental critical situation of the Earth. The elimination of some costly prefabrication processes such as molding or post-fabrication stages such as machining and welding required in traditional manufacturing methods favor the AM process and provide beneficial economic advantages. Furthermore, the reduction of manufacturing steps contributes to environmental protection through fewer operations, less material, and energy consumption, and reduced transportation. This study is a review for the assessment of environmental impact and life cycle of some well-known AM technologies for manufacturing metallic parts and components. The fabrication of a pump impeller is simulated through a well-known metal production AM technology and casting process for direct comparison. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is applied to measure the environmental impact in five different stages of pump impeller lifetime with the two different fabrication processes. AM compared to casting has an environmental impact reduction potential of 15%, 20%, 65%, 20%, and 10% respectively in Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidifications Potential (AP), Water Aquatic Eco-toxicity Potential (FAETP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP), and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion (ODP). Using hydroelectricity and renewable electricity mitigate the environmental impact of the AM process in pre-manufacturing and manufacturing stages temporarily until the advancement of AM technology for consuming less energy. Recommendations for future research to enhance the environmental sustainability of the AM process is proposed as outcomes of this study.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumptionJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2013
- Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD® process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessmentJournal of Cleaner Production, 2011
- What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates?Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2011
- Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studiesInternational Journal of Production Research, 2010
- Stratospheric Ozone DepletionPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2009
- Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCAJournal of Cleaner Production, 2008
- The energy benefit of stainless steel recyclingEnergy Policy, 2008
- Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applicationsEnvironment International, 2004
- IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodologyThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003
- ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessmentThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999