Gender, cognitive closeness and situated assessments in academic recruitment
Open Access
- 12 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in European Journal of Higher Education
Abstract
Gendered bias in peer-review and other forms of assessments is a well-studied area. But how do researchers actually execute their positions of power in recruitment processes? In Sweden, recruitment for academic tenure and the reviewers’ reports are public and thus open for scrutiny. This study uses both bibliographic coupling and close reading of three cases of reviewers’ reports to map cognitive closeness, distance and particularities as intrinsic aspects of peer review. All these concepts point towards the fact that reviewers are researchers as well. Their own research interests are both what makes their expert assessment possible as well as an aggravation, which calls for ‘situated knowledges’: a reflection of why and how they make the particular recruitment decisions they do. The cases are read against the backdrop of the emerging neoliberalisation of Swedish academia. At the breaking point between traditional academic ideals and neoliberal accounts of concepts like ‘research quality’, different forms of masculinities are struggling for hegemony, while the system’s lack of transparency creates disadvantage for women academics.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic databaseJournal of Informetrics, 2012
- The rules of the game: women and the leaderist turn in higher educationGender and Education, 2012
- Governing Knowledge: Research Steering and Research QualityEuropean Educational Research Journal, 2008
- Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of biasResearch Evaluation, 2004
- The Promise of Feminist Reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's Project for Feminist Science StudiesHypatia, 2004
- Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and its Gender EffectsGender, Work & Organization, 2003
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review SystemScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1991
- Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial PerspectiveFeminist Studies, 1988
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977