Virtual phone clinics in orthopaedics: evaluation of clinical application and sustainability
Open Access
- 13 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 10 (4), e001349
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001349
Abstract
Aims Adoption of virtual clinics has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and they will continue to form an integral part of healthcare delivery. Our objective was to evaluate virtual clinics in orthopaedic practice and determine how to use them effectively and sustainably. Methods We surveyed 100 consecutive patients participating in orthopaedic virtual phone clinic (VPC) at an academic hospital to evaluate patient satisfaction against face-to-face (F2F) consultations and obtain suggestions for improving patient experience, and we surveyed 23 clinicians who conducted orthopaedic VPCs in 2020. Data were correlated with clinic outcomes, reason for consultation, diagnosis, patient age and clinician grade. Consultation duration, clinician-associated costs and reimbursement were analysed. Significance was tested using two-tailed Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test. Results Patient satisfaction (out of 5) for VPC was significantly lower than F2F (4.1 vs 4.5, p=0.0003), and a larger proportion of VPC scored Conclusion VPC plays a valuable role when clinical evaluation has been performed or considered not necessary. Offering the choice of VPC or F2F, adding video capability and providing a time interval for VPC may reduce resource use and increase satisfaction. We recommend renegotiating VPC tariffs and cost-neutral modifications of clinic structure.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysisBMJ Open, 2017
- Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trialBMC Health Services Research, 2016
- Comparing hospital and telephone follow‐up for patients treated for stage–I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non‐inferiority trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2016
- The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labelsInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2010
- Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statisticsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2010
- Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trialBMJ, 2009
- Telephone consultations in secondary careRespiratory Medicine, 2007
- Cost-effectiveness of telephone or surgery asthma reviews: economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial.2005
- Telephone or surgery asthma reviews? Preferences of participants in a primary care randomised controlled trialPrimary Care Respiratory Journal, 2005
- On the Definition and Evaluation of TelemedicineTelemedicine Journal, 1995