Spatial and temporal trends in social vulnerability and COVID-19 incidence and death rates in the United States
Open Access
- 24 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (3), e0248702
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248702
Abstract
Socially vulnerable communities may be at higher risk for COVID-19 outbreaks in the US. However, no prior studies examined temporal trends and differential effects of social vulnerability on COVID-19 incidence and death rates. Therefore, we examined temporal trends among counties with high and low social vulnerability to quantify disparities in trends over time. We conducted a longitudinal analysis examining COVID-19 incidence and death rates from March 15 to December 31, 2020, for each US county using data from USAFacts. We classified counties using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a percentile-based measure from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with higher values indicating more vulnerability. Using a Bayesian hierarchical negative binomial model, we estimated daily risk ratios (RRs) comparing counties in the first (lower) and fourth (upper) SVI quartiles, adjusting for rurality, percentage in poor or fair health, percentage female, percentage of smokers, county average daily fine particulate matter (PM2.5), percentage of primary care physicians per 100,000 residents, daily temperature and precipitation, and proportion tested for COVID-19. At the outset of the pandemic, the most vulnerable counties had, on average, fewer cases per 100,000 than least vulnerable SVI quartile. However, on March 28, we observed a crossover effect in which the most vulnerable counties experienced higher COVID-19 incidence rates compared to the least vulnerable counties (RR = 1.05, 95% PI: 0.98, 1.12). Vulnerable counties had higher death rates starting on May 21 (RR = 1.08, 95% PI: 1.00,1.16). However, by October, this trend reversed and the most vulnerable counties had lower death rates compared to least vulnerable counties. The impact of COVID-19 is not static but can migrate from less vulnerable counties to more vulnerable counties and back again over time.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL141589)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: A nationwide cross-sectional studyPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- The Three Steps Needed to End the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bold Public Health Leadership, Rapid Innovations, and Courageous Political WillJMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2020
- Prisons and custodial settings are part of a comprehensive response to COVID-19The Lancet Public Health, 2020
- Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 2020
- Bayesian Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Based on Pólya-Gamma MixturesBayesian Analysis, 2019
- Bayesian negative binomial regression for differential expression with confounding factorsBioinformatics, 2018
- The LZIP: A Bayesian Latent Factor Model for Correlated Zero-Inflated CountsBiometrics, 2016
- Spatiotemporal hurdle models for zero-inflated count data: Exploring trends in emergency department visitsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2014
- High Dimensional Structured Additive Regression Models: Bayesian Regularization, Smoothing and Predictive PerformanceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2011
- VULNERABILITY IN RESEARCH AND HEALTH CARE; DESCRIBING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM?Bioethics, 2008