Institutional-Level Differences in Quality and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Resections in the United States
- 13 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Social psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale
- Vol. 159 (4), 1630-1641
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.075
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Cancer Institute
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Outcome of Surgical Resection for Pathologic N0 and Nx Non-small Cell Lung CancerJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2010
- Comparison of Commission on Cancer–Approved and –Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data BaseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer SurgeryJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Sublobar resection for lung cancerEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2008
- Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation: A Pooled Analysis by the LACE Collaborative GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Lung Cancer ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988