Are Sex Differences in Mating Preferences Really “Overrated”? The Effects of Sex and Relationship Orientation on Long-Term and Short-Term Mate Preferences
- 4 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Evolutionary Psychological Science
- Vol. 6 (2), 174-187
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00223-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cooperation as a signal of genetic or phenotypic quality in female mate choice? Evidence from preferences across the menstrual cycleBritish Journal of Psychology, 2011
- Short- and Long-Term Relationship Orientation and 2D:4D Finger-Length RatioArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2010
- The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexualityEvolution and Human Behavior, 2007
- Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than oneJournal of Research in Personality, 2007
- The Preferred Traits of Mates in a Cross-National Study of Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women: An Examination of Biological and Cultural InfluencesArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2007
- A mature evolutionary psychology demands careful conclusions about sex differencesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005
- The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: Men and women do it differentlyThe Journal of Sex Research, 1999
- Minimum Mate Selection Standards as a Function of Perceived Mate Value, Relationship Context, and GenderJournal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1998
- The truth must be in here somewhere: Examining the gender discrepancy in self‐reported lifetime number of sex partnersThe Journal of Sex Research, 1997