Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes
- 9 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 108 (11), 1380-1387
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab233
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer has important technical limitations. Robot-assisted and transanal TME (TaTME) may overcome these limitations, potentially leading to lower conversion rates and reduced morbidity. However, comparative data between the three approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for laparoscopic TME, robot-assisted TME and TaTME in expert centres. Methods: Patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between 2015 and 2017 in expert centres for laparoscopic, robot-assisted or TaTME were included. Outcomes for TME surgery performed by the specialized technique in the expert centres were compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was conversion rate. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and pathological outcomes. Results: A total of 1078 patients were included. In rectal cancer surgery in general, the overall rate of primary anastomosis was 39.4, 61.9 and 61.9 per cent in laparoscopic, robot-assisted and TaTME centres respectively (P<0.001). For specialized techniques in expert centres excluding abdominoperineal resection (APR), the rate of primary anastomosis was 66.7 per cent in laparoscopic, 89.8 per cent in robot-assisted and 84.3 per cent in TaTME (P<0.001). Conversion rates were 3.7 , 4.6 and 1.9 per cent in laparoscopic, robot-assisted and TaTME respectively (P=0.134). The number of incomplete specimens, circumferential resection margin involvement rate and morbidity rates did not differ. Conclusion: In the minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer more primary anastomoses are created in robotic and TaTME expert centres.This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme: key messages and future perspectivesColorectal Disease, 2013
- The Dutch Surgical Colorectal AuditEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2013
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ScoreAnnals of Surgery, 2012
- Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal CancerSurgery, 2010
- Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Macroscopic Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Resection Specimen: Clinical Significance of the Pathologist in Quality ControlJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?British Journal of Surgery, 1982