How does government discourse make people vulnerable?
- 25 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Disaster Prevention and Management
- Vol. 29 (5), 697-710
- https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-07-2020-0225
Abstract
This paper develops a model of social vulnerability. Specifically, it aims to (1) determine the factors of social vulnerability to flood risks and (2) interrogate the discursive structure and framing of vulnerability within the local domain of disaster governance. This is a descriptive-survey research design mobilized through sequential exploratory mixed method. For ordinary people, vulnerability is due to five factors: (1) government inaction, (2) age-based frailty, (3) disability-based social exclusion, (4) weak social capital and (5) material susceptibility. Moreover, there are two patterns of discursive structure surrounding the risk of flooding in Davao del Norte: (1) where Cavendish banana is a favored export commodity of those who are in power, the Pressure-and-Release Model fits within the narrative of land-use changes in the province, and (2) where the local domain of disaster governance frames the DRR as a “hero-villain” normative duality. At the policy level, the findings should inform the current government practices in development planning to mitigate flood risks, specifically the proposed Philippine National Land-use Act and the pending Bill to create the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) Department. Operationally, the “hero-villain” finding challenges the self-awareness of disaster managers and functionaries whose technical trainings inculcated a one-size-fits-all approach to disaster response. The findings support the theory that disaster and disaster risks are socially constructed realities. This paper teased out the gap between the people's risks perceptions in Davao del Norte and the government's DRR episteme, and it points to power relations that impede its closing.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- People’s capacities in facing hazards and disasters: an overviewNatural Hazards, 2018
- Taking Children’s Voices in Disaster Risk Reduction a Step ForwardInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015
- The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and Persons with DisabilitiesInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015
- Children with Disabilities and Disaster Risk Reduction: A ReviewInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015
- Analysis of the seismic vulnerability and the structural characteristics of houses in Chinese rural areasNatural Hazards, 2013
- Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A ReviewThe Journal of Educational Research, 2006
- Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, tsunamis, and other disastersThe Lancet, 2005
- Can Redistributive Reform be Achieved via Market-Based Voluntary Land Transfer Schemes? Evidence and Lessons from the PhilippinesThe Journal of Development Studies, 2005
- Rendering the World Unsafe: ‘Vulnerability’ as Western DiscourseDisasters, 2001
- Analyzing argumentation in planning and public policy: assessing, improving, and transcending the Toulmin modelEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1998