The association between unexpected weight loss and cancer diagnosis in primary care: a matched cohort analysis of 65,000 presentations
Open Access
- 15 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 122 (12), 1848-1856
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0829-3
Abstract
Background We aimed to understand the time period of cancer diagnosis and the cancer types detected in primary care patients with unexpected weight loss (UWL) to inform cancer guidelines. Methods This retrospective matched cohort study used cancer registry linked electronic health records from the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink from between 2000 and 2014. Univariable and multivariable time-to-event analyses examined the association between UWL, and all cancers combined, cancer site and stage. Results In all, 63,973 patients had UWL recorded, of whom 1375 (2.2%) were diagnosed with cancer within 2 years (days-to-diagnosis: mean 181; median 80). Men with UWL (HR 3.28 (2.88–3.73)) and women (1.87 (1.68–2.08)) were more likely than comparators to be diagnosed with cancer within 3 months. The association was greatest in men aged ≥50 years and women ≥70 years. The commonest cancers were pancreas, cancer of unknown primary, gastro-oesophageal, lymphoma, hepatobiliary, lung, bowel and renal-tract. The majority were late-stage, but there was some evidence of association with stage II and stage III cancers. In the 3–24 months after presenting with UWL, cancer diagnosis was less likely than in comparators. Conclusion UWL recorded in primary care is associated with a broad range of cancer sites of early and late-stage.Keywords
Funding Information
- DH | National Institute for Health Research
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case–control study using electronic recordsBritish Journal of General Practice, 2014
- Involuntary Weight LossMedical Clinics of North America, 2014
- Ignoring the matching variables in cohort studies – when is it valid and why?Statistics in Medicine, 2013
- Symptoms and risk factors to identify women with suspected cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithmBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- Symptoms and risk factors to identify men with suspected cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithmBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- The risk of pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case–control study using electronic recordsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in EnglandThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosisBritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Predictive Value of Symptoms for Ovarian Cancer: Comparison of Symptoms Reported by Questionnaire, Interview, and General Practitioner NotesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009