Estimating utility value for female genital mutilation
Open Access
- 29 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08947-4
Abstract
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a clear violation of women’s rights and can have adverse and irreversible health effects as well. Worldwide, more than 200 million women and girls have undergone FGM/C. Utility value of FGM/C has not been estimated yet, so we designed this study to extract the health utility value of FGM/C for the first time in the world. In a cross-sectional study in Iran, 125 girls and women who underwent FGM/C procedure were examined by the trained midwives in order to determine its type. In addition, a questionnaire was completed for identifying the socio-demographic factors and extracting the health utility of these individuals. Health utility was measured using Time Trade-off method and also to determine the effects of the socio-demographic factors on the health utility a two-limit censored regression model was applied. The mean and median of the health utility of women with FGM/C were 0.971 (SE: 0.003) and 0.968 (IQR: 1–0.95), respectively. Number of non-traders was 58 (46.4%) who reported perfect health utility. However, the mean of health utility among traders was 0.946 (SE: 0.002). Only type 1 (Clitoridectomy) and type 2 (Excision) FGM/C were seen in this study. Women with Type 1 FGM/C had significantly lower health utility value (Mean: 0.968, Median: 0.957) than their type 2 counterparts (Mean: 0.987, Median: 1.00). Moreover, women in the age group of 31–45 years (Mean: 0.962, Median: 0.956), single (Mean: 0.950, Median: 0.954), divorced (Mean: 0.951, Median: 0.950), employed (Mean: 0.959, Median: 0.956), and with supplementary insurance (Mean: 0.962, Median: 0.950) had significantly lower health utility than their counterparts. FGM/C affects physical and psychological well-being of these individuals, resulting in a lack of personal and marital satisfaction, which ultimately leads to a 3% reduction in their health related quality of life. Therefore, preventing from this practice is very important and should be considered by health system policy makers more than before.Other Versions
Funding Information
- Kurdistan University Of Medical Sciences (377/1396)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)Maturitas, 2015
- A Tradition in Transition: Factors Perpetuating and Hindering the Continuance of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Summarized in a Systematic ReviewHealth Care for Women International, 2013
- Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of changeReproductive Health Matters, 2013
- Improving Decision Analyses: Parent Preferences (Utility Values) for Pediatric Health OutcomesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2009
- Impact of schizophrenia and schizophrenia treatment-related adverse events on quality of life: direct utility elicitationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2008
- The Effects of Female Genital Mutilation on the Onset of Sexual Activity and Marriage in GuineaArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2007
- Prevalence and determinants of the practice of genital mutilation of girls in Khartoum, SudanPaediatrics and International Child Health, 2006
- Utility values and myopia in medical students in SingaporeClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2005
- A Catalog of Dermatology Utilities: A Measure of the Burden of Skin DiseasesJournal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings, 2004
- Female genital mutilation in NigeriaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2003