Pressing questions in the study of psychological and behavioral diversity
- 5 November 2018
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 115 (45), 11366-11368
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814733115
Abstract
Extreme biased sampling of research participants and the neglect of their cultural context are increasingly recognized as threats to the generalizability of much of what we know about human thought and behavior (1, 2). In addition to reinforcing narrow views of what it means to be human, these parochial research practices have also shaped the methodological core of the human sciences by favoring tasks that are tailored to the skills, motivations, and social expectations of a very rarefied set of humanity (3). Despite decades of calls for reform, there is little evidence that increasing awareness of this threat has led to changes in practice or publishing (2, 4). This special issue stems from the Sackler Colloquium on “Pressing Questions in the Study of Psychological and Behavioral Diversity” (September 7–9, 2017) designed to address these issues. Building on discussions emerging from two National Science Foundation-funded workshops held in 2016 and 2017, the colloquium convened scholars from a wide range of disciplines who have conducted important research with diverse populations. The colloquium participants identified barriers that discourage researchers from harnessing the full breadth of human diversity for understanding human thought and behavior. These included concerns about current peer review practices, methodological narrowness, lack of researcher diversity, and the need for theoretical frameworks that are sensitive to cultural, social, and ecological variation. Participants also shared innovations and insights from their own research that can foster and inform future investigations of human diversity. In this introduction, we highlight three threads that weave together the 10 papers in this special issue. The first thread documents the theoretical and practical payoffs of engaging with a broader range of participants (and the pitfalls of failing to do so). The second thread identifies barriers to pursuing such work and proposes potential solutions to overcome them. … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dhruschk{at}asu.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (BCS-1647219)
- National Science Foundation (BCS-1623555)
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens : Making psychological science more representative of the human populationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018
- Sophisticated collaboration is common among Mexican-heritage US childrenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018
- Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to cultureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018
- Learning from failures of protocol in cross-cultural researchProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018
- The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to actionJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2017
- Psychological Science as a Complex System: Report CardPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2017
- Systems of (non-)diversityNature Human Behaviour, 2017
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and social cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2017
- Editorial.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2016
- Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral scienceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010