How close are we to standardised extended RAS gene mutation testing? The UK NEQAS evaluation
Open Access
- 28 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 70 (1), 58-62
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203822
Abstract
Aims: Since 2008, KRAS mutation status in exon 2 has been used to predict response to anti-EGFR therapies. Recent evidence has demonstrated that NRAS status is also predictive of response. Several retrospective ‘extended RAS’ analyses have been performed on clinical trial material. Despite this, are we really moving towards such extended screening practice in reality?Methods: Data were analysed from four consecutive UK National External Quality Assessment Service for Molecular Genetics Colorectal cancer External Quality Assessment schemes (during the period 2014–2016), with up to 110 laboratories (worldwide) participating in each scheme. Testing of four or five tumour samples is required per scheme. Laboratories provided information on which codons were routinely screened, and provided genotyping and interpretation results for each sample.Results: At least 85% of laboratories routinely tested KRAS codons 12, 13 and 61. Over the four schemes, an increasing number of laboratories routinely tested KRAS codons 59, 117 and 146. Furthermore, more laboratories were introducing next generation sequencing technologies. The pattern of ‘extended testing’ was reassuringly similar for NRAS, although fewer laboratories currently test for mutations in this gene. Alarmingly, still only 36.1% and 24.1% of participating laboratories met the ACP Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics Group and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, respectively, for extended RAS testing in the latest assessment.Conclusions: Despite recommendations in the UK and USA on extended RAS testing, there has clearly been, based on these results, a delay in implementation. Inadequate testing results in patients being subjected to harmful treatment regimens, which would not be the case, were routine practice altered, in line with evidence-based guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Molecular Genetics External Quality Assessment Pilot Scheme for KRAS Analysis in Metastatic Colorectal CancerGenetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 2011
- Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Analysis of Overall Survival According to Tumor KRAS and BRAF Mutation StatusJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Systematic Review: Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Treatment Effect Modification byKRASMutations in Advanced Colorectal CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Randomized Phase III Study of Panitumumab With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) Compared With FOLFIRI Alone As Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: A meta-analysis of 22 studiesEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancerThe Lancet Oncology, 2008
- Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008