Online racial discrimination and the role of white bystanders.
- 1 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Psychologist
- Vol. 77 (1), 39-55
- https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000603
Abstract
Public Significance Statement This study suggests that the harm caused to Black college students by online discrimination may be reduced when White college students publicly confront racist posts. White students may be more likely to publicly confront racist posts if they (a) are aware of the harm it causes to their Black peers; (b) perceive social norms that support confronting discrimination; and (c) receive guidance on what to say. Black college students attending historically and predominantly White institutions are increasingly encountering online racial discrimination. This exposure may increase psychological distress and undermine academic performance. Although White bystanders may be well-positioned to challenge racist posts, limited research has examined interventions to increase White students' willingness to confront online racial discrimination. The present study used multiple methodologies to characterize the nature and frequency of online racial discrimination college students face, understand its impact on Black students, and increase challenges to online discrimination among White bystanders. Study data include content scraped from campus-related social media platforms over a 3-month period, transcripts from 8 focus groups conducted separately with Black (n = 35) and White (n = 33) college students, and data from an online experiment with 402 White college students. Taken together, study findings indicated that Black students encounter online racial discrimination with nontrivial frequency and are harmed by this exposure. Black students noted, however, that harm is mitigated when online racial discrimination is challenged by their White peers. Further, findings indicated that White students may be more likely to publicly confront racist posts if they (a) are aware of the harm it causes their Black peers; (b) perceive social norms that support confronting discrimination; and (c) receive guidance on what to say.Keywords
Funding Information
- William T. Grant Foundation (187818)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology.American Psychologist, 2013
- The Marley HypothesisPsychological Science, 2012
- Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the LiteratureAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2011
- The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflectionsPsychology & Health, 2011
- How to Cook Rice: A Review of Ingredients for Teaching anti‐PrejudiceAustralian Psychologist, 2011
- The Effect of Target Status on Witnesses' Reactions to Confrontations of BiasBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 2010
- Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and PracticeAnnual Review of Psychology, 2009
- Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006
- Confronting Prejudice (Literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender BiasPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003
- Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic reviewBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2001