Inpatient hospital procedural volume and outcomes following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
- 25 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 31 (8), 1908-1919
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14584
Abstract
Introduction The real‐world distribution of hospital atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation volume and its impact on outcomes are not well‐established. We sought to examine patient characteristics, complications, and readmissions after AF ablation stratified by hospital procedural volume. Methods and Results Using the nationally representative inpatient Nationwide Readmissions Database, we evaluated 54,597 admissions for AF ablation between 2010 and 2014. Hospitals were categorized according to tertiles of annual AF ablation volume. Index complications, 30‐day readmissions and early mortality were examined. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of adverse outcomes. Between 2010 and 2014, low volume tertile hospitals accounted for 79.3% of hospitals performing AF ablations. When stratified by 1st, 2nd and 3rd volume tertiles, complication and early mortality rates were higher in low volume centers (8.9% and 0.67% vs. 6.1% and 0.33%, vs. 4.5% and 0.16%, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients undergoing AF ablation at low volume centers were older and had a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and other co‐morbidities. Low volume hospitals were associated with increased cardiac perforation (adjusted OR 4.79; P < 0.001), vascular complications (aOR 1.49; P < 0.001), and any complication (aOR 2.06; P < 0.001) during index admission as well as increased early mortality (aOR 2.43; P = 0.039). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized for AF ablation, low inpatient AF ablation hospital volume was associated with worse outcomes following ablation, which was exacerbated by a greater co‐morbidity burden among patients at these centers.Keywords
Funding Information
- Michael Wolk Heart Foundation (17081089)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTSEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2016
- Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted DeviceJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016
- COCATS 4, the 2015 CCEP Advanced Training Statement, and the Transition From 12 to 24 Required Months of Electrophysiology TrainingJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2016
- Benefits and risks of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2015
- 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial FibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014
- In-Hospital Complications Associated With Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in the United States Between 2000 and 2010Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013
- Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study)European Heart Journal, 2013
- Long‐Term Clinical Efficacy and Risk of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in the ElderlyJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2008
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Statistics notes: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni methodBMJ, 1995