Exploring how key performance indicators influence nursing and midwifery practice: A mixed‐methods study
- 21 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 77 (12), 4900-4918
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15049
Abstract
Aims To scope the key performance indicators (KPIs) used in nursing and midwifery across the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland and explore how they influence practice in healthcare organizations. Design The study adopted a sequential, exploratory mixed-methods design. Methods Phase 1 incorporated a multiple-choice questionnaire completed by 77 Directors of Nursing recruited using voluntary response sampling. In phase 2, 35 nurses and midwives who were working at executive, senior manager and clinical levels, participated in semi-structured interviews. Data collection of both phases was conducted from January 2016 to October 2016. Findings Quantitative data revealed over 100 nursing and midwifery-specific KPIs. National requirements were a deciding factor in KPI selection, while clinical involvement was mainly through data collection. Respondents stated that they used patient experience KPIs, but only one was assessed as valid. Thematic analysis identified two themes: The leadership challenge (including ‘voiceless in the national conversation’, ‘aligning KPIs in the practice context’ and ‘listening to those who matter’); and taking action (including ‘establishing ownership and engaging staff’, ‘checks and balances’ and ‘closing the loop’). Conclusion The large volume of KPI measurement taking place makes meaningful evaluation of performance and quality of care difficult, both in and across organizations. Nurses and midwives require enhanced knowledge of the nature and purpose of KPIs, as evidence gained from KPI data collection is insufficient to lead to improvements in practice. A practice context that encourages collective leadership, where multiple sources of evidence are gathered and everyone is included in KPI evaluation and subsequent decision-making, is key. Impact This study adds to the body of evidence on KPI understanding. It informs the future effective management of indicators that will facilitate the delivery of meaningful care and reduce the cost, time and effort invested in the implementation of KPIs and data management.Keywords
Funding Information
- Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for better measurement: a systematic and interpretive reviewBMC Nursing, 2013
- Knowledge translation of research findingsImplementation Science, 2012
- Accountability – are We Better off Without It?Public Management Review, 2012
- Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approachJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2011
- Accounting for health-care outcomes: implications for intensive care unit practice and performanceHealth Services Management Research, 2010
- The art of caring: Invisible and subordinated?: A response to Juliet Corbin: ‘Is caring a lost art in nursing?’International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2008
- Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challengesImplementation Science, 2008
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based SurveysEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2000