Harmonization of laboratory results by data adjustment in multicenter clinical trials
Open Access
- 1 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Korean Association of Internal Medicine in The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 33 (6), 1119-1128
- https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2017.034
Abstract
Background/Aims: In multicenter clinical trials, laboratory tests are performed in the laboratory of each center, mostly using different measuring methodologies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate coefficients of variation (CVs) of laboratory results produced by various measuring methods and to determine whether mathematical data adjustment could achieve harmonization between the methods. Methods: We chose 10 clinical laboratories, including Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs), the central laboratory, for the measurement of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum triglycerides, creatinine, and glucose. The serum panels made with patient samples referred to GC Labs were sent to the other laboratories. Twenty serum samples for each analyte were prepared, sent frozen, and analyzed by each participating laboratory. Results: All methods used by participating laboratories for the six analytes had traceability by reference materials and methods. When the results from the nine laboratories were compared with those from GC Labs, the mean CVs for total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose analyzed using the same method were 1.7%, 3.7%, 4.3%, and 1.7%, respectively; and those for triglycerides and creatinine analyzed using two different methods were 4.5% and 4.48%, respectively. After adjusting data using Deming regression, the mean CV were 0.7%, 1.4%, 1.8%, 1.4%, 1.6%, and o.8% for total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, creatinine, and glucose, respectively. Conclusions: We found that more comparable results can be produced by laboratory data harmonization using commutable samples. Therefore, harmonization efforts should be undertaken in multicenter trials for accurate data analysis.Keywords
Funding Information
- Korean National Strategic Coordinating Center
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Significant interarm blood pressure difference predicts cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patientsMedicine, 2016
- Harmonization: the Sample, the Measurement, and the ReportAnnals of Laboratory Medicine, 2014
- Statistical considerations for harmonization of the global multicenter study on reference valuesClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2014
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.Published by H1 Connect ,2013
- Roadmap for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Measurement ProceduresClinical Chemistry, 2011
- Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2011
- A Reference Method Laboratory Network for Cholesterol: A Model for Standardization and Improvement of Clinical Laboratory MeasurementsClinical Chemistry, 2000
- Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progressScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1999
- Direct measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulfated alpha-cyclodextrinClinical Chemistry, 1995
- Measurement of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol in serum: a status reportClinical Chemistry, 1992