Prognostic value of post-induction chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET-CT in stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer before (chemo-) radiation
Open Access
- 11 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 14 (10), e0222885
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222885
Abstract
The purpose of our present study was to assess the prognostic impact of FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study included 50 patients with inoperable stage II/III NSCLC from January 2012 to July 2015. They were treated for curative intent with induction chemotherapy, followed by concomitant chemoradiation therapy or sequential radiation therapy. FDG PET-CT scans were acquired at initial staging (PET1) and after the last cycle of induction therapy (PET2). Five parameters were evaluated on both scans: SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, TLG, MTV, and their respective deltas. The prognostic value of each parameter for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated with Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Median follow-up was 19 months. PET1 parameters, clinical and histopathological data were not predictive of the outcome. TLG2 and ΔTLG were prognostic factors for OS. TLG2 was the only prognostic factor for PFS. For OS, log-rank test showed that there was a better prognosis for patients with TLG2< 69g (HR = 7.1, 95%CI 2.8–18, p = 0.002) and for patients with ΔTLG< -81% after induction therapy (HR = 3.8, 95%CI 1.5–9.6, p = 0.02). After 2 years, the survival rate was 89% for the patients with low TLG2 vs 52% for the others. We also evaluated a composite parameter considering both MTV2 and ΔSUVmax. Patients with MTV2> 23cc and ΔSUVmax> -55% had significantly shorter OS than the other patients (HR = 5.7, 95%CI 2.1–15.4, p< 0.01). Post-induction FDG PET might be an added value to assess the patients’ prognosis in inoperable stage II/III NSCLC. TLG, ΔTLG as well as the association of MTV and ΔSUVmax seemed to be valuable parameters, more accurate than clinical, pathological or pretherapeutic imaging data.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II Study of a Radiotherapy Total Dose Increase in Hypoxic Lesions Identified by 18F-Misonidazole PET/CT in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (RTEP5 Study)Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2017
- Volume-Based Assessment With 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Outcome Prediction for Patients With Stage IIIA-N2 Non–Small Cell Lung CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2015
- Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of 18F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014
- FDG PET during radiochemotherapy is predictive of outcome at 1 year in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective multicentre study (RTEP2)European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014
- Prognostic Value of Whole-Body Total Lesion Glycolysis at Pretreatment FDG PET/CT in Non–Small Cell Lung CancerRadiology, 2012
- Is pre-therapeutical FDG-PET/CT capable to detect high risk tumor subvolumes responsible for local failure in non-small cell lung cancer?Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2009
- Prognostic Value of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Repeat 18F-FDG PET for monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancerLung Cancer, 2007
- Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004Annals of Oncology, 2005
- Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinomaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004