Análise das políticas de plágio na publicação científica: o caso de um segmento de revistas da área de Ciências Humanas na América Latina
Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Transinformação
Abstract
Plagiarism is unacceptable in science, particularly when it appears in scientific publications, due to the enormous damage and risk it may pose to the credibility of published results. This study analyzed 14 journals indexed in Brazil's Scientific Electronic Library Online database which focus on anthropology, linguistics, and archeology, five international and nine Brazilian. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used, along with interviews to collect data. Seven of the 14 journals adopt international practices and standards, notably a 2018 good practice guide for scientific publication provided on the Scientific Electronic Library Online website as well as guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics, and "Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals" of 2019. Only seven adopt the Creative Commons Attribution License. Ethics is an essential issue for humanity, and the scientific arena is no different. Brazilian and international standards contain experiences that can be extremely valuable in the academic environment as a response when unintentional plagiarism appears, and represent important measures that should be taken by scientific editors.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018
- Antifraud editorial policy in Spanish and Latin American scientific publication: JCR social sciences editionComunicar, 2016
- A epidemia de más condutas na ciência: o fracasso do tratamento moralizadorScientiae Studia, 2015
- Más condutas científicas uma abordagem crítico-comparativa para in-formar uma reflexão sobre o temaRevista Brasileira de Educação, 2015
- Ciência Aberta: correntes interpretativas e tipos de ação │ Open Science: interpretive trends and types of actionLiinc em Revista, 2014
- O fator de impacto influencia na ética das instruções aos autores de uma revista?Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 2013
- Orientador ou tutor é autor?Informação & Informação, 2010
- Escritores-fantasma e comércio de trabalhos científicos na internet: a ciência em riscoRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 2007
- Autoria de um trabalho científicoRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 2002
- Direitos autorais na InternetCiência da Informação, 1998