Exploring Mobile Banking Service Quality: A Qualitative Approach
- 2 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Services Marketing Quarterly
- Vol. 41 (2), 182-204
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2020.1742982
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the key dimensions of mobile banking (m-banking) service quality. Four qualitative methods (focus group, in-depth interviews, critical incident technique, and netnography) were used for data collection. Inductive content analysis and Pareto analysis were used to explore the key themes (dimensions). Results demonstrated that privacy and security, customer support, interactivity, efficiency, and content were the key dimensions. The findings of the study provide useful insights for developing a scale to measure m-banking service quality. Practically, the findings will help banks understand consumers’ expectations, and provide directions for providing quality m-banking services.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mobile banking service quality and customer relationshipsInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2017
- Member CheckingQualitative Health Research, 2016
- Internet banking service quality and its implication on e-customer satisfaction and e-customer loyaltyInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2016
- Bank Service Quality (BSQ) IndexInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2011
- Measuring the quality of e‐banking portalsInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2005
- Mobile banking: concept and potentialInternational Journal of Mobile Communications, 2003
- SYSTRA‐SQ: a new measure of bank service qualityInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 2002
- A reliable and valid measurement scale for the perceived service quality of banksInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2000
- Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building and Marketing Strategy FormulationJournal of Marketing Research, 1994
- The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable IncidentsJournal of Marketing, 1990